The LNAT is the shared admissions test for nine UK law schools, split into a scored 95-minute Section A of 42 reading-comprehension questions and an unscored 40-minute Section B essay that admissions tutors read directly rather than relying on any LNAT-assigned grade — a structural quirk that gives the ungraded half of the test genuine weight in real decisions. Section A produces the test's only number, out of 42, but how heavily that score actually counts varies dramatically by institution: Oxford treats it as roughly 40% of first-round selection, while universities like Glasgow and SOAS weight it closer to 15-20% alongside grades and personal statements. With only one sitting permitted per admissions cycle and no legal knowledge required to do well, the real preparation challenge is less about content and more about pacing — finishing all 12 Section A passages inside a strict 95-minute window while still leaving a clear, well-argued position on the Section B essay rather than a hedged, unfocused one. Because the same score can carry very different practical stakes depending on which of the nine participating universities is reading it, understanding a specific target school's weighting matters as much as the raw score itself.